Archive
jan@apache.org
mastodon: @janl@narrativ.es
github.com/janl
GPG Fingerprint: D2B1 7F9D A23C 0A10 991A F2E3 D9EE 01E4 7852 AEE4
OTR Key: 83DFF1C9 95252513 D430604F 5E244CCC C8795B4B

The FOSDEM Pledge

↤ October 22th, 2026

The FOSDEM organising team has rejected a proposal for a DEI room at FOSDEM 2027. This is that last in a long line of opportunities not taken by the organisers. The predominantly cis, white and male audience at FOSDEM is a direct result of this neglect.

And yet FOSDEM is a vital focal point for the FOSS community every year and attendance helps fostering a community we desperately need. Ensuring diversity in the attendees and speakers is essential for the long-term success of our movement.

As a fellow cis-white-man, I am proposing the FOSDEM Pledge:

Let’s diversify FOSDEM!

—

FaQ

This won’t do anything.

That’s not a question and yeah maybe, but I also don’t want to do nothing and passively support the status quo.

There is so much more we need to do in DEI, for example X, Y and Z.

I agree, I’m doing this, you can pick one of the others.

I’m a not-cis-male-white person and I don’t feel comfortable attending an event with such a demography.

I understand and I am not asking you to attend or in any way absolve FOSDEM of their responsibility by doing this. My hope is that future FOSDEMs might be something you’d be willing to attend.

I’m a white cis man, why am I made to feel like a problem?

If we are the majority of attendees, it is on us to say “who is not here, and why”, if the organisers won’t do that work. This is our chance to be part of the solution.

FOSDEM has so many other problems that compound my discomfort with it.

I understand and possibly agree, I’m tackling this first. Maybe showing outside organising on a topic encourages others, or the organisers, to address the other issues.

❧